{"id":105,"date":"2006-08-08T12:25:45","date_gmt":"2006-08-08T12:25:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2006\/08\/08\/the-golden-ratio\/"},"modified":"2006-08-08T12:25:45","modified_gmt":"2006-08-08T12:25:45","slug":"the-golden-ratio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/2006\/08\/08\/the-golden-ratio\/","title":{"rendered":"&#966;, the Golden Ratio"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lots of folks have been asking me to write about &phi;, the golden ratio. I&#8217;m finally giving up and doing it. I&#8217;m not a big fan of &phi;. It&#8217;s a number<br \/>\nwhich has been adopted by all sorts of flakes and crazies, and there are alleged sightings of it in all sorts of strange places that are simply *not* real. For example, pyramid loons claim that the great pyramids in Egypt have proportions that come from &phi; &#8211; but they don&#8217;t. Animal mystics claim that the ratio of drones to larvae in a beehive is approximately &phi; &#8211; but it isn&#8217;t.<br \/>\nBut it is an interesting number. My own personal reason for thinking it&#8217;s cool is representational: if you write &phi; as a continued fraction, it&#8217;s [1;1,1,1,1&#8230;]; and if you write it as a continued square root, it&#8217;s 1 + sqrt(1+sqrt(1+sqrt(1+sqrt(1&#8230;)))).<br \/>\nWhat is &phi;?<br \/>\n&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br \/>\n&phi; is the value so-called &#8220;golden ratio&#8221;: it&#8217;s the number that is a solution for the equation (a+b)\/a = (a\/b). (1+sqrt(5))\/2. It&#8217;s the ratio where if you take a rectangle where the ratio of the length of the sides is 1:&phi;, then if you remove the largest possible square from it, you&#8217;ll get another rectangle whose sides have the ration &phi;:1. If you take the largest square from that, you&#8217;ll get a rectangle whose sides have the ratio 1:&phi;. And so on:<\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"phi.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scientopia.org\/img-archive\/goodmath\/img_27.jpg?resize=267%2C186\" width=\"267\" height=\"186\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Allegedly, it&#8217;s the proportion of sides of a rectangle that produce the most aesthetically beautiful appearance. I&#8217;m not enough of a visual artist to judge that, so I&#8217;ve always just taken that on faith. But it *does* shows up in many places in geometry. For example, if you draw a five-pointed star, the ratio of the length of one of the point-to-point lines of the star to the length of the sides of the pentagon inside the star are &phi;:1:<\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"pentaphi.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scientopia.org\/img-archive\/goodmath\/img_28.jpg?resize=235%2C234\" width=\"235\" height=\"234\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&phi; is also related to the fibonacci series. In case you don&#8217;t remember, the fibonacci series is the set of numbers where each number in the series is the sum of the two previous: 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,&#8230; If Fib(n) is the *n*th number in the series, you can compute it as:<br \/>\n<img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"phi-fix-eq.gif\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scientopia.org\/img-archive\/goodmath\/img_29.gif?resize=107%2C34\" width=\"107\" height=\"34\" \/><br \/>\nHistory<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lots of folks have been asking me to write about &phi;, the golden ratio. I&#8217;m finally giving up and doing it. I&#8217;m not a big fan of &phi;. It&#8217;s a number which has been adopted by all sorts of flakes and crazies, and there are alleged sightings of it in all sorts of strange places [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-numbers"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-1H","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}