Remember back in the end of june, when I [talked about these insane bozos][code] who were [predicting that a nuclear bomb would be blown up in the UN plaza?][firsttime] And they were on their fourth prediction about when this would happen? And how each time they blew it, [they came up with an excuse for why they were wrong?][update]
\nI thought it would be fun to take a look back at them, and see what they’re up to six weeks later. Naturally, [they’re still at it.][bozos] They’ve updated their prediction 5 more times now.
\nBut there are a couple of really amusing things about what they’re up to now.
\nFirst, they’ve declared victory:
\n>We correctly predicted that the UN would lose its headship in 2006Tammuz (this
\n>being the 2nd head of the image of the Beast of Revelation 13) which gets a
\n>death stroke but then recovers. It lost its head on 2006July12 when Israel
\n>invaded Lebanon without a UN mandate. The UN lost credibility and lost control >for a month. It lost headship over Israel for one month. But the image of the
\n>Beast does not lose two heads, it only loses one head. Each of the 7 heads of
\n>the image of the UN Beast stands for one month of military headship over the
\n>governments of the world, just as the 7 heads of the UN Beast itself each stand
\n>for one year of military headship over the governments of the world. So we knew
\n>it had to regain headship this month and it did by virtue of the multilaterally
\n>agreed UN Security Council ceasefire resolution of Friday 2006August11. Now the
\n>UN will declare Peace and Security and then sudden destruction will befall them
\n>according to 1 Thessalonians 5:3. So please leave NYC for the sabbath!!!
\nAnd second, they’ve worked *their errors* into their code. That is, they’re now saying that their bible code *predicts* that they’d get it wrong seven times, so that their *eighth* prediction will be right. But they’ve made 9 predictions! So what to do? Well, hedge of course. You see, only the *correct* incorrect predictions count. So they have an explanation for why *some* of the incorrect predictions were *correct* incorrect predictions, and some were *incorrect* incorrect predictions.
\n>On April 29th we started predicting dates for a terrorist Nuclear Bomb at the
\n>UN in midtown. After making several mistakes we realised that 1 Kings 18:43
\n>declared we would get it right at the 8th attempt (Since Elijah asked his
\n>attendant to go and look for a man made mushroom cloud 7 times after the first
\n>no show, making 8 attempts in all). The trouble is that we have found it hard
\n>to decide just what a valid attempt is. Here are all the incorrect dates we
\n>have so far proposed…
\n>
\n>2006Iyyar21 (May 19\/20) [7 days after 2006Iyyar14]
\n>2006Iyyar28 (May 26\/27) [7 days after first mistaken date]
\n>2006Iyyar11 (June 8\/9) [First day of the 2,000 pigs of Mark 5 incorrectly calculated]
\n>2006Sivan12 (June 9\/10) [First day of the 2,000 pigs of Mark 5 correctly calculated but misinterpreted]
\n>2006Tammuz2\/3 (June30-July2) [7th sabbath after first mistaken date\/7th sabbath omitting 2006Sivan5]
\n>2006Tammuz4-6 (July2 – July 4) [7th sabbath day when we asked people to lookout]
\n>2006Tammuz28\/29 (July 25 – 27) [Assumed contest began on 911]
\n>2006Ab3\/4 (July 30 – August 1) [Assumed second ‘day’ of contest began when wheat went limit up in Chicago]
\n>2006Ab8 (August 4\/5) [Assumed second ‘day’ of contest began on non BLC day of 2006Adar28 so that 1750th day is sabbath]<\/br>
\n>
\n>What we now propose is…
\n>
\n>2006Ab15 (August 11\/12) [7th sabbath lookout period after first mistake]
\n>
\n>So one could say you have had 9 attempts, you screwed up each time, give up and
\n>try doing something less dramatic! But although our repeated failures would at
\n>first sight take more and more credibility away from our work, the world
\n>security situation is for a fact moving in a direction that lends more and more
\n>credibility to our work. We started behaving as prophets of Doom for the UN and
\n>for Manhattan on April 29th 2006, when we proposed 2006Iyyar11 (June 8\/9) as
\n>the date of the first nuclear terrorist attack. At that time the following
\n>global security situation existed…
\nGotta love it, eh?
\nI’ll give ’em credit for their persistence, if not for their intelligence, or their sanity, or their rationality, or even their theology.
\n[update]: http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/goodmath\/2006\/07\/an_update_on_the_bible_code_bo.php
\n[code]: http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/goodmath\/2006\/07\/bible_code_bozos.php
\n[firsttime]: http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/goodmath\/2006\/06\/good_math_bad_math_might_be_in.php
\n[bozos]: http:\/\/www.truebiblecode.com\/index.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Remember back in the end of june, when I [talked about these insane bozos][code] who were [predicting that a nuclear bomb would be blown up in the UN plaza?][firsttime] And they were on their fourth prediction about when this would happen? And how each time they blew it, [they came up with an excuse for […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[44],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-numerology"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-1P","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}