{"id":181,"date":"2006-10-09T21:48:25","date_gmt":"2006-10-09T21:48:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2006\/10\/09\/navier-stokes-false-alarm\/"},"modified":"2006-10-09T21:48:25","modified_gmt":"2006-10-09T21:48:25","slug":"navier-stokes-false-alarm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/2006\/10\/09\/navier-stokes-false-alarm\/","title":{"rendered":"Navier Stokes: False Alarm"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s bad news on the math front. Penny Smith has *withdrawn* her Navier Stokes paper, because of the discovery of a serious error.<br \/>\nBut to be optimistic for a moment, this doesn&#8217;t mean that there&#8217;s nothing there. Remember that when Andrew Wiles first showed his proof of Fermat&#8217;s last theorem, he discovered a very serious error. After that, it took him a couple of years, and some help from a colleague, but he *did* eventually fix the problem and complete the proof.<br \/>\nWhatever develops, it remains true that Professor Smith has made *huge* strides in her work on Navier-Stokes, and if she hasn&#8217;t found the solution  yet, she has at least helped pave to road to it. Here&#8217;s hoping that she finishes it!<br \/>\nGood luck, Professor Smith! We&#8217;re pulling for you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s bad news on the math front. Penny Smith has *withdrawn* her Navier Stokes paper, because of the discovery of a serious error. But to be optimistic for a moment, this doesn&#8217;t mean that there&#8217;s nothing there. Remember that when Andrew Wiles first showed his proof of Fermat&#8217;s last theorem, he discovered a very serious [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-goodmath"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-2V","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}