{"id":242,"date":"2006-12-12T09:50:47","date_gmt":"2006-12-12T09:50:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2006\/12\/12\/really-silly-wine-woo\/"},"modified":"2006-12-12T09:50:47","modified_gmt":"2006-12-12T09:50:47","slug":"really-silly-wine-woo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/2006\/12\/12\/really-silly-wine-woo\/","title":{"rendered":"Really Silly Wine Woo"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While there&#8217;s nothing mathematical about this bit of silly woo, I couldn&#8217;t resist mocking it. There&#8217;s a Japanese inventor who claims to have created a device that instantly ages wine through a magical homeopathic-sounding process of magically restructuring water molecules.<br \/>\nFor why I can&#8217;t resist&#8230; Well, you see, I&#8217;m a<br \/>\nbit of a wine nut, and I&#8217;m particularly passionate about one very special wine: vintage Port. The problem with vintage Port is that it&#8217;s pretty close to undrinkable when it&#8217;s young; it needs to sit and age for at least a decade; 20 to 30 years is better for a really good one. Buying it aged for that long is very expensive (I&#8217;ve paid as much as $210 for a particularly good bottle of 1970 port that I used for my Y2K New Years Eve party); and waiting for it to age in the basement is both frustrating and tricky. (If it gets too warm, it can be ruined; if it gets too damp, the cork can rot and ruin it; if it gets too dry, the cork can shrink and ruin it.)   So anything that could *really* accelerate the ageing process without wrecking the wine is something that I would really love to see.<br \/>\nThere are two links for this. First, [a short NYT piece](http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/12\/10\/magazine\/10section4.t-8.html?_r=2&amp;oref=login&amp;oref=slogin):<br \/>\n&gt;As liquor ages, Tanaka explains, the water molecules slowly rearrange themselves more closely around<br \/>\n&gt;the alcohol molecules, giving the alcohol its distinctive mature taste. Tanaka puts that process into<br \/>\n&gt;overdrive. He pours the wine into a 70-pound container outfitted with an electrolysis chamber. A<br \/>\n&gt;few-second electrical zap gives the wine a slight charge, which breaks up the water molecules and<br \/>\n&gt;allows them to blend more completely with the alcohol. Voil\u00e0: Instantly-aged pinot noir, &#8220;smoother and<br \/>\n&gt;more mellow than before,&#8221; Tanaka&#8217;s American partner, Edward Alexander, claims.<br \/>\nPure bullshit. In wine, what you&#8217;re going for in the aging process is breaking down tannins. Tannins are<br \/>\na compound that come primarily from the skins in red wines. When you drink a young red wine, and there&#8217;s a bitterish bite, and a sensation that the wine is drying your mouth, that&#8217;s coming from the tannins. Over time, some the tannins are decomposed, and settle out of the wine as sediments in the bottle. The end result is that there&#8217;s less of the hard biting tannin, and you can taste the wine. The big tradeoff is that the parts of the grape that give a red wine the most flavor are the same parts that contribute the tannins. So most good red wines are very tannic when young,  and they need to be<br \/>\naged for a while to allow enough of the tannins to break and settle.<br \/>\nAs always, though, there&#8217;s some tradeoff. The organic chemicals that can give wine a fruity flavor<br \/>\nalso break down as the wine ages. So if you like the fruity flavor of a wine like a good red Zinfandel (note the **red** in that statement!), you  have to drink it young. The usual trick for that is to open the wine, and &#8220;let it breathe&#8221; &#8211; that is, let it sit open to the air for a while. The oxidation process that happens when you expose wine to air will start to break down the tannins, so that the wine will be less harsh.<br \/>\nNone of this is magic; none of it has anything to do with any homeopathy-like woo about clustering water molecules around alchohol. It&#8217;s relatively simple organic chemistry.<br \/>\nSo guess what these guys have done? They&#8217;ve invented a machine that bubbles the wine through a bunch of hoses with some air and passes electricity through it. The important part is &#8220;bubbles through a bunch of hoses with some air&#8221;. They&#8217;re just doing a quicker version of the &#8220;letting it breathe&#8221; thing, and attaching some silly woo to explain why you need their fancy expensive machine to do it.<br \/>\nAnyway &#8211; here&#8217;s the *real* prize. They did a [promotional *cartoon* about their gadget,][cartoon] complete with<br \/>\nwoo-babble about charging water with &#8220;positive electricity&#8221; and wine (I think they meant alchohol)  with &#8220;negative electricity&#8221; in order to make the water be attracted to and cluster around the alchohol.<br \/>\n[cartoon]: http:\/\/www.salon.com\/ent\/video_dog\/ads\/2006\/12\/11\/wine\/index.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While there&#8217;s nothing mathematical about this bit of silly woo, I couldn&#8217;t resist mocking it. There&#8217;s a Japanese inventor who claims to have created a device that instantly ages wine through a magical homeopathic-sounding process of magically restructuring water molecules. For why I can&#8217;t resist&#8230; Well, you see, I&#8217;m a bit of a wine nut, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bad-physics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-3U","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}