{"id":255,"date":"2006-12-26T20:20:19","date_gmt":"2006-12-26T20:20:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2006\/12\/26\/doctor-who-chatter\/"},"modified":"2006-12-26T20:20:19","modified_gmt":"2006-12-26T20:20:19","slug":"doctor-who-chatter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/2006\/12\/26\/doctor-who-chatter\/","title":{"rendered":"Doctor Who Chatter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Like my friend and blogfather [Orac][orac], I&#8217;m a huge fan of Doctor Who, and I&#8217;ve been<br \/>\ngreatly enjoying its renewed life in the new series on BBC. In fact, the current Doctor, played by David Tennant, has become my favorite of all of the Doctors &#8211; better than the<br \/>\nusual fan favorite of Tom Baker, better than my own former favorite, Jon Pertwee.<br \/>\nThe reason why I&#8217;m such a fan of Tennant is that his Doctor combines many of the personality<br \/>\ntraits of the past Doctors, while giving it his own unique spin. Tennant&#8217;s Doctor has the<br \/>\nhands-on activity of Jon Pertwee, the exuberance of Peter Davison, the sense of *history* of<br \/>\nWilliam Hartnell (the very first Dr), and the kind of goofy enthusiasm of Tom Baker.<br \/>\nBut he&#8217;s more than just a mish-mash of past Doctors &#8211; he&#8217;s got those traits that connect his<br \/>\ncharacter to his past incarnations, but he&#8217;s definitely his own person. His hyperactive<br \/>\nexuberance is quite different from any Doctor we&#8217;ve seen before. Now that&#8217;s partly just the<br \/>\nstyle of writing in the new series: the Christopher Eccleston Doctor had a similar<br \/>\nhyperactivity. But Eccleston&#8217;s hyperness was much more self-focused: his Doctor was almost as<br \/>\negocentric as the Colin Baker incarnation. Tennant&#8217;s Doctor is just enthusiastic about the<br \/>\nuniverse, about humanity, about the excitement of living. But that&#8217;s also played in conflict<br \/>\nwith the other major trait of this Doctor: he&#8217;s got a darkness, an edge of bitterness and<br \/>\nalienation just below the surface.<br \/>\nOne of my favorite examples of this comes from last season&#8217;s episode &#8220;School Reunion&#8221; which<br \/>\nfeatures the return of Sarah Jane Smith, the old companion of Tom Baker&#8217;s Doctor. Overall, Tennant&#8217;s Dr. in the episode is the bouncy happy silly doctor &#8211; particularly when he finally gets to admit to Sarah Jane that he is the Doctor, and when SJ shows him K9. But there&#8217;s<br \/>\na scene, where he&#8217;s alone with the leader of the Krillitane, the villains of the episode. The<br \/>\nKrillitane tries to entice the Doctor to join forces with him, and Tennant sneers and replies<br \/>\nthat in his youth he was so very patient, so very merciful, but *not any more*. Now he only<br \/>\ngives one warning, and this is it.<br \/>\nThe reason I&#8217;m writing all this today is that I just watched a bit-torrented download of this<br \/>\nyears special Christmas episode. Overall, it&#8217;s a rather goofy (if fun) affair &#8211; a rather<br \/>\nover-the-top monster story. But it&#8217;s got another really wonderful scene that is so typical of<br \/>\nwhat I like about this Doctor. He&#8217;s coming in to confront the monster, disguised as one of her<br \/>\nrobots. After revealing himself, he shuts down the rest of her robots with great humorous<br \/>\nflair using the (extremely large) remote control hidden in his pocket (it&#8217;s larger on the<br \/>\ninside!); and he offers the monster one chance to let him move her and her children to some<br \/>\nother planet, where they won&#8217;t harm anyone. She refuses, and he replies &#8220;then this is *your*<br \/>\ndoing&#8221;, reveals that he is from Gallifrey, and destroys all of her children. It&#8217;s a great<br \/>\nscene, and one that does a remarkable job of demonstrating just *who* this Doctor is.<br \/>\nAt the end, the woman who appears to be the new companion doesn&#8217;t join the Doctor, but<br \/>\ntells him to find someone. He naturally replies, &#8220;I don&#8217;t need anyone&#8221;. She disagrees,<br \/>\nand tells him that she believes that he sometimes needs someone &#8220;to stop him&#8221; &#8211; and<br \/>\nin one of those perfectly played bits of alienation and loneliness at the heart of this<br \/>\ndoctor, he agrees. It&#8217;s a subtly played scene, but it&#8217;s perfect.<br \/>\nAnyway, overall, this years Christmas special is good, but not great. As I said above,<br \/>\nit&#8217;s really a bit over-the-top and goofy. Definitely *not* the best writing of the<br \/>\nnew series. But it&#8217;s got a few really tremendous scenes, and overall, it leaves me<br \/>\nwith confidence that Russell Davies and crew are going to continue to do a great job<br \/>\nof keeping Doctor Who alive and kicking.<br \/>\n[orac]: http:\/\/www.scienceblogs.com\/insolence<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Like my friend and blogfather [Orac][orac], I&#8217;m a huge fan of Doctor Who, and I&#8217;ve been greatly enjoying its renewed life in the new series on BBC. In fact, the current Doctor, played by David Tennant, has become my favorite of all of the Doctors &#8211; better than the usual fan favorite of Tom Baker, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-doctor-who"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-47","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}