{"id":309,"date":"2007-02-14T18:05:16","date_gmt":"2007-02-14T18:05:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2007\/02\/14\/basics-calculus\/"},"modified":"2007-02-14T18:05:16","modified_gmt":"2007-02-14T18:05:16","slug":"basics-calculus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/2007\/02\/14\/basics-calculus\/","title":{"rendered":"Basics: Calculus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> Calculus is one of the things that&#8217;s considered terrifying by most people. In fact, I&#8217;m sure a lot of people will consider me insane for trying to write a &#8220;basics&#8221; post about something like calculus. But I&#8217;m not going to try to teach you calculus &#8211; I&#8217;m just going to try to explain very roughly what it means and what it&#8217;s for.<\/em><\/p>\n<p> There are actually two different things that we call calculus &#8211; but most people are only aware of one of them. There&#8217;s the standard pairing of differential and integral calculus; and then there&#8217;s what we computer science geeks call a calculus. In this post, I&#8217;m only going to talk about the standard one; the computer science kind of calculus I&#8217;ll write about some other time.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p> The first one &#8211; the more common one &#8211; is a branch of mathematics that uses limits<br \/>\nand\/or infinitessimal values to analyze curves. Limits can be used in one way (the<br \/>\ndifferential calculus) to look at incredibly small sections of a curve to figure out<br \/>\nhow it&#8217;s changing &#8211; and in particular, to find <em>patterns<\/em> in how it changes. Limits can be used in another way (the integral calculus) to compute the area under<br \/>\na curve by adding up an infinitely large number of infinitely small values.<\/p>\n<p> In differential calculus, what you&#8217;re usually doing is taking a curve described by an equation, and figuring out a new equation (the <em>derivative<\/em> of the curve) that describes how the first one changes. For example &#8211; look at a curve like y=x<sup>2<\/sup>. At any point in time, the curve has a slope &#8211; but it&#8217;s constantly changing. But what we can do is look at that curve, and say that at any point x, the slope of the curve will be 2x.<\/p>\n<p> What does that <em>mean<\/em>? There are a lot of things that can be understood in<br \/>\nterms of rates of change. Suppose that you measured the position of a moving object,<br \/>\nand worked out an equation that described where it was along a line at any point in<br \/>\ntime. Let&#8217;s say that that equation for the total distance moved in t seconds was f(t)=3t<sup>3<\/sup>+5t+11 meters. So:<\/p>\n<p>f(t)=3t<sup>3<\/sup>+5t+11<\/p>\n<p> Now, suppose I want to know how fast it was moving after 3 seconds, that is, at time t=3. How could I figure that out? It&#8217;s <em>not<\/em> moving at a constant speed. At any two moments, the speed is different. How can we know how fast it&#8217;s moving at a particular point in time?<\/p>\n<p> The velocity that something is moving at some point in time is how much it changes its position divided by the length of the period of time; if position=p, then the<br \/>\nvelocity v=&Delta;p\/&Delta;t. Since the velocity is constantly changing, though, that equation isn&#8217;t too much good for us. We can&#8217;t say how fast it&#8217;s moving at t=3.<\/p>\n<p> We can use it to start homing in. Between t=2 and t=3, it moved from (24+10+11)=45 to (81+15+11)=107 &#8211; so it moved 107-45=62 meters &#8211; so its average speed between t=2 and t=3 was 62 meters\/1 second = 62 meters\/second. Between t=2.5 and t=3, it moved from 70.375 to 107 &#8211; so its average speed for that half second was 36.625 meters\/0.5 seconds = 73 1\/4 meters per second. From t=2.9 to t=3, its average speed was 8.33meters\/0.1 seconds=83.3 meters\/second. From time t=2.9999 to time 3, it&#8217;s average speed was approximately 85.99 meters\/second. To know <em>exactly<\/em> what speed it was moving at t=3, I need to know its velocity at <em>precisely<\/em> t=3 &#8211; an interval of length 0 at exactly t=3. The way that we can do that is to pull out a limit: the speed at time t=3 is lim<sub>&delta;&rarr;0<\/sub>(f(3)-f(3-&delta;))\/&delta;=86 meters per second.<\/p>\n<p> We can do that <em>symbolically<\/em> on the original equation (I&#8217;m not going to go through the whole process), and end up with the velocity at time t=9t<sup>2<\/sup>+5. This second equation is called the <em>derivative<\/em> of the original equation.<\/p>\n<p> In integral calculus, what you&#8217;re usually doing is taking a curve described by an<br \/>\nequation, and figuring out a new equation that tells you the area under the curve. (the<br \/>\n<em>integral<\/em> of the curve) So, again, taking the curve y=x<sup>2<\/sup>, we can ask<br \/>\nwhat&#8217;s the area under the curve between x=0 and x=6? The area under the curve<br \/>\ny=x<sup>2<\/sup> is x<sup>3<\/sup>\/3; so the area between 0 and 6 is 72. It can be used for the opposite of what we just did with the derivative &#8211; if we have an equation showing its velocity at different instants, we can figure out an equation for its position.<\/p>\n<p> Differential calculus and integral calculus started out as two different (if conceptually related) fields &#8211; but they were tied together by something called the <em>fundamental theorem of calculus<\/em>. Stated very roughly and informally, what the fundamental theorem basically says is: if I start with some curve, and I take its derivative, and then I take the integral of the derivative, I&#8217;ll get back the same equation that I started with.<\/p>\n<p> The history of calculus is really interesting &#8211; but to get into detail would be a whole post of its own. Basically, what we call calculus was invented <em>roughly<\/em> simultaneously by Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz. Basically, Newton probably did work out the ideas of calculus first, but he didn&#8217;t publish it; Leibniz started later, but published first. The notations that we generally use for calculus are mostly those of Leibniz, as is the <em>name<\/em> calculus &#8211; Newton called it &#8220;the method of fluxions&#8221;. This conflict led to a huge feud between Leibniz and Newton, which expanded into a conflict between the mathematicians of England and the mathematicians of the European conflict. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calculus is one of the things that&#8217;s considered terrifying by most people. In fact, I&#8217;m sure a lot of people will consider me insane for trying to write a &#8220;basics&#8221; post about something like calculus. But I&#8217;m not going to try to teach you calculus &#8211; I&#8217;m just going to try to explain very roughly [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[74],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-basics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-4Z","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}