{"id":31,"date":"2006-06-18T15:56:00","date_gmt":"2006-06-18T15:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2006\/06\/18\/the-stupidity-of-numerology-illustrated-by-infinite-sequences\/"},"modified":"2006-06-18T15:56:00","modified_gmt":"2006-06-18T15:56:00","slug":"the-stupidity-of-numerology-illustrated-by-infinite-sequences","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/2006\/06\/18\/the-stupidity-of-numerology-illustrated-by-infinite-sequences\/","title":{"rendered":"The Stupidity of Numerology, illustrated by Infinite Sequences"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I was glancing at the comments on the post that I linked to about &#8220;0.999&#8230;=1&#8221;. And one of them was such a wonderful example of crap numerology, which I enjoy laughing at, that I just had to repost it here:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nVERY GOOD.<br \/>\nBut there&#8217;s a couple tricks<br \/>\nyou missed.<br \/>\nFirst, simple pattern<br \/>\ncompletion<br \/>\n1\/9 = .11111&#8212;<br \/>\n2\/9 = .22222&#8212;<br \/>\n3\/9 = .33333&#8212;<br \/>\n4\/9 = .44444&#8212;<br \/>\n5\/9 = .55555&#8212;<br \/>\n6\/9 = .66666&#8212;<br \/>\n7\/9 = .77777&#8212;<br \/>\n8\/9 = .88888&#8212;<br \/>\nand therefore by logical<br \/>\nextension<br \/>\n9\/9 = .99999&#8212;<br \/>\nbut of course, 9\/9 = 1.<br \/>\nAnd then there are the<br \/>\nSPIRITUAL implications<br \/>\n.9 a soul<br \/>\n+ .09<br \/>\n+ .009 adding experience<br \/>\n+ .0009<br \/>\n+ .00009<br \/>\n!<br \/>\n! infinitely increasing<br \/>\n!<br \/>\nor the infinitely<br \/>\nrepeating process<br \/>\nof growing greater<br \/>\ni.e. life<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was glancing at the comments on the post that I linked to about &#8220;0.999&#8230;=1&#8221;. And one of them was such a wonderful example of crap numerology, which I enjoy laughing at, that I just had to repost it here: VERY GOOD. But there&#8217;s a couple tricks you missed. First, simple pattern completion 1\/9 = [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[44],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-numerology"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-v","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}