{"id":44,"date":"2006-06-25T11:25:06","date_gmt":"2006-06-25T11:25:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2006\/06\/25\/strange-connections\/"},"modified":"2006-06-25T11:25:06","modified_gmt":"2006-06-25T11:25:06","slug":"strange-connections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/2006\/06\/25\/strange-connections\/","title":{"rendered":"Strange Connections"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here at SB, we use Google analytics for getting info about how many people are reading our blogs, and how they get here. I also have a SiteMeter monitor on GM\/BM.  One thing that I get a kick out of is taking a look at my hits, and seeing what kinds of interesting connections come up. Sometimes it&#8217;s funny; sometimes it&#8217;s informative, sometimes it&#8217;s just depressing.<br \/>\nSo last night, I was unwinding after putting my kids to bed, and was taking a look. The interesting\/amusing connections I found:<br \/>\n1. The number one search term leading people to Good Math, Bad Math? &#8220;pharyngula&#8221;. PZ, I hate you! (And yes, I&#8217;m deliberately not linking. \ud83d\ude42 )<br \/>\n2. The number one persons name in searches that lead people to GM\/BM? &#8220;Ken Ham&#8221;. Now *that* is depressing. Ken Ham, who I&#8217;ve never written about, directs more hits to my blog than my own name.<br \/>\n3. The strangest search term that led readers here: &#8220;butt propeller&#8221;. And not just once; three separate visits on three separate days got here via searches for &#8220;butt propeller&#8221;. I&#8217;m really not sure what to make of this one. Probably related to my post on Swinburne where I talked about monkeys flying out of my butt as a metaphor.<br \/>\n4. An interesting connection: I posted something yesterday about a [really bad probability argument][bad-prob] for Christianity. I got the link through email from a reader. It turns out that it&#8217;s on a fairly obscure site that [Orac][orac] had linked to in a friday post about Holocaust denial. The reader who sent me the link is definitely one of Orac&#8217;s readers as well; so the nasty probability argument was discovered through an unrelated subject on scienceblogs. I like the SB networking aspect of that; on the other hand, I wish I&#8217;d looked at the site hosting the wretched argument that I mocked; I&#8217;d rather not have given a bunch of asshole holocaust deniers the publicity.<br \/>\n5. Back on GM\/BMs [old home][gmbm-blogger] on blogger, I did a couple of posts about a crackpot named Gary Osborne. Gary came to the blog to &#8220;defend&#8221; himself. (His idea of defending himself is call other people names, and then complain that their criticisms of him are ad hominems.) An interesting thing that I noticed was that every time he posted on the blog, I&#8217;d see referrals from a rather obscure british search engine with Gary&#8217;s name as the search keyword. After he stopped responding, the hits from that engine went away. Suddenly, I&#8217;m seeing a bunch of referrals from that engine, and I discovered that Gary has, once again, posted a [web-page][osborne-declares-victory] on a site without comments discussing his wonderful victory over me, and various GM\/BM readers who joined the original discussion. Gotta love people who run away from debates and declare victory, eh?<br \/>\n6. Most disturbing search terms that found my blog?: &#8220;juniper lee cartoon porn&#8221;. I have no idea who Juniper Lee is. Frankly, I&#8217;m too scared to do the search and find out.<br \/>\n7. Unexpected linkages: 65 page views referred from [animalcules][animalcules]. Since I&#8217;ve never submitted any of my posts to that, and I didn&#8217;t know of anyone linking to me in articles in animalcules, I was surprised (in a good way) by that.<br \/>\n8. Another very surprising one: a search for &#8220;daily show&#8221; and &#8220;kurt vonnegut&#8221; led people to GM\/BM twice.<br \/>\n9. A couple of frequent commenters here are frequent trollers on Panda&#8217;s Thumb. Since I frequently don&#8217;t pay a lot of attention to the names of commenters on other blogs, unless I get into a discussion with them, I hadn&#8217;t noticed the connection.<br \/>\n10. Three different people set up blogs specifically to respond to something I posted. Each has exactly one post.<br \/>\n[bad-prob]: http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/goodmath\/2006\/06\/fundie_probability_even_worse.php<br \/>\n[orac]: http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/insolence\/2006\/06\/who_perpetrated_the_holohoax.php<br \/>\n[gmbm-blogger]: http:\/\/goodmath.blogspot.com<br \/>\n[osborne-declares-victory]: http:\/\/www.gardinersworld.com\/content\/view\/72\/45\/<br \/>\n[animalcules]: http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/aetiology\/2006\/02\/announcing_new_blog_carnival_1.php<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here at SB, we use Google analytics for getting info about how many people are reading our blogs, and how they get here. I also have a SiteMeter monitor on GM\/BM. One thing that I get a kick out of is taking a look at my hits, and seeing what kinds of interesting connections come [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[39],"tags":[308],"class_list":["post-44","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-meta","tag-meta"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-I","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}