{"id":700,"date":"2008-11-05T12:44:16","date_gmt":"2008-11-05T12:44:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2008\/11\/05\/miscellaneous-post-election-tidbits\/"},"modified":"2008-11-05T12:44:16","modified_gmt":"2008-11-05T12:44:16","slug":"miscellaneous-post-election-tidbits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/2008\/11\/05\/miscellaneous-post-election-tidbits\/","title":{"rendered":"Miscellaneous Post-Election Tidbits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> Sorry about the abrupt end to the liveblogging last night; Firefox crashed, and CoverItLive wouldn&#8217;t let me log back in as the moderator.<\/p>\n<p> Anyway, it&#8217;s a good day to be a liberal. As you all know by now, it was Obama in an absolute landslide. He won by a huge margin in the electoral vote, and by a good margin in the popular vote. <\/p>\n<p> The Democrats also kicked Elizabeth Dole and John Sununu out of the senate, which is wonderful. But they didn&#8217;t take enough seats to get<br \/>\npast a filibuster in the Senate. This means that we can expect to see a really dramatic level of obstructionism from the remaining Republicans in the senate. And based on various comments that he made, I think we can count on Holy Joe Lieberman to join in with the right-wingers in blocking the Senate from getting anything done.<\/p>\n<p> There are a few interesting things that I wanted to comment on.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p> First, Nate Silver at <a href=\"http:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\">FiveThirtyEight<\/a> did an<br \/>\n<em>amazing<\/em> job. Nate&#8217;s analysis were really dead-on. If you want<br \/>\nto see someone doing a really nice job of careful, thorough statistical<br \/>\nanalysis, just go over to Nate&#8217;s site, and take a look at how he build<br \/>\nhe models. I&#8217;d been expecting his predictions to be very good, based on<br \/>\nthe great job that he did with the math, and now that we&#8217;ve got the<br \/>\nresults, you can see how that paid off. Comparing his predicted<br \/>\nelectoral map to the actual electoral map, he got <em>every<\/em> state<br \/>\nright. I&#8217;ve never seen such a dead-on prediction.<\/p>\n<p> Second, the Bradley effect appears to be dead. If you&#8217;ve been hiding in a cave for the last month, the Bradley effect refers to a supposed tendency for people to deny their racism by telling pollsters that they&#8217;d vote for a black candidate when in the real privacy of the voting booth, they wouldn&#8217;t. All of the results from yesterday seem to point to the fact that there was no Bradley effect in this election: the results match the pre-election polls <em>extremely<\/em> closely, with no shift of white voters to McCain. That&#8217;s a very good thing. Contrary to the claims of some Conservative bloggers  I&#8217;ve seen trying to find something positive in this election outcome, that doesn&#8217;t mean that there&#8217;s no more racism in America; but it <em>does<\/em> mean that racism isn&#8217;t<br \/>\nnearly as dominant as it once was. Not too long ago, it would have been<br \/>\nimpossible for a black man to be elected President. Even a dozen years ago, it would have been shocking to see a state like Virginia vote for a black president &#8211; especially one with an <em>Arabic<\/em> first name!<\/p>\n<p> Third, there&#8217;s a lot of talk about the turnout in the election. I don&#8217;t recall which channel I was watching, but as results were coming in from Ohio, one reporter was saying &#8220;Black turnout in Cleveland was only around 18%, which is only up 2% from four years ago&#8221;. That&#8217;s a rather classic bad-math error. A two percent increase over 16% is 16.32% &#8211; which is a trivial change. A change from 16% to 18% is actually a 12.5% increase &#8211; which is <em>very<\/em> significant. I heard similar things quoted with respect to youth voting. The easiest way to demonstrate<br \/>\nthe meaning of that error is to ask &#8220;What would you say if the voting rate increased from 20% to 40%?&#8221; Most people would respond &#8220;The turnout doubled&#8221;, not &#8220;The turnout increased by 20%.&#8221; But as is all too typical, the people reporting the election results are mathematical illiterates. (In fact, some of them are <em>pround<\/em> mathematical illiterates; many reporters basically <em>brag<\/em> about how bad they are at math. The worst example of that that I recall is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/blog\/2006\/02\/15\/BL2006021501989.html\">here<\/a>, where Richard Cohen not only proudly brags about how he doesn&#8217;t know algebra, but also admits that he &#8211; a political reporter who covers elections &#8211; doesn&#8217;t understand <em>percentages<\/em>.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sorry about the abrupt end to the liveblogging last night; Firefox crashed, and CoverItLive wouldn&#8217;t let me log back in as the moderator. Anyway, it&#8217;s a good day to be a liberal. As you all know by now, it was Obama in an absolute landslide. He won by a huge margin in the electoral vote, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-bi","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=700"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/700\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}