{"id":787,"date":"2009-07-16T14:03:10","date_gmt":"2009-07-16T14:03:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2009\/07\/16\/chaotic-systems-and-escape\/"},"modified":"2018-11-27T21:09:07","modified_gmt":"2018-11-28T02:09:07","slug":"chaotic-systems-and-escape","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/2009\/07\/16\/chaotic-systems-and-escape\/","title":{"rendered":"Chaotic Systems and Escape"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/scientopia.org\/img-archive\/goodmath\/img_403.jpg?resize=390%2C283\" width=\"390\" height=\"283\" alt=\"nbody.jpg\" class=\"inset right\" \/><\/p>\n<p> One of the things that confused my when I started reading about chaos is easy to explain using what we&#8217;ve covered about attractors. <em>(The image to the side was created by Jean-Francois Colonna, and is part of his slide-show <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lactamme.polytechnique.fr\/Mosaic\/descripteurs\/AVirtualSpaceTimeTravelMachine.Ang.html\">here<\/a>)<\/em><\/p>\n<p> Here&#8217;s the problem: We know that things like <a href=\"http:\/\/faculty.ifmo.ru\/butikov\/Projects\/Collection6.html\">N-body gravitational systems are chaotic<\/a> &#8211; and a common example of that is how a gravity-based orbital system that appears stable for a long time can suddenly go through a transition where one body is violently ejected, with enough velocity to permanently escape the orbital system.<\/p>\n<p> But when we look at <a href=\"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2009\/06\/chaos\">the definition of chaos<\/a>, we see the requirement for dense periodic orbits.  But if a body is ejected from a gravitational system,  ejection of a body from a gravitational system is a demonstration of chaos, how can that system have periodic orbits? <\/p>\n<p> The answer relates to something I mentioned in the last post. A system doesn&#8217;t have to be chaotic <em>at all points<\/em> in its phase space. It can be chaotic <em>under some conditions<\/em> &#8211; that is, chaotic in some parts of the phase space. Speaking loosely, when a phase space has chaotic regions, we tend to call it a chaotic phase space. <\/p>\n<p> In the gravitational system example, you <em>do<\/em> have a region of dense periodic orbits. You can create an N-body gravitational system in which the bodies will orbit forever, never actually <em>repeating<\/em> a configuration, but also never completely breaking down. The system will never repeat. Per <a href=\"http:\/\/scientopia.org\/blogs\/goodmath\/2007\/07\/order-from-chaos-using-graphs-ramsey-theory\">Ramsey theory<\/a>, given any configuration in its phase space, it <em>must<\/em> eventually come <em>arbitrarily close<\/em> to repeating that configuration. But that doesn&#8217;t mean that it&#8217;s really repeating: it&#8217;s chaotic, so even those infinitesimal differences will result in divergence from the past &#8211; it will follow a different path forward.<\/p>\n<p> An attractor of a chaotic system shows you a region of the phase space where the system behaves chaotically. But it&#8217;s <em>not<\/em> the entire phase space. If the attractor covered the entire space, it wouldn&#8217;t be particularly interesting or revealing. What makes it interesting is that it captures a region where you get chaotic behavior. The attractor isn&#8217;t the whole story of a chaotic systems phase space &#8211; it&#8217;s just one interesting region with useful analytic properties.<\/p>\n<p> So to return to the N-body gravitational problem: the phase space of an N-body gravitational system does contain an attractor full of dense orbits. It&#8217;s definitely very sensitive to initial conditions. There are definitely phase spaces for N-body systems that are topologically mixing. None of that precludes the possibility that you can create N-body gravitational systems that break up and allow escape. The escape property isn&#8217;t a good example of the chaotic nature of the system, because it encourages people to focus on the wrong properties of the system. The system isn&#8217;t chaotic because you can create gravitational systems where a body will escape from what seemed to be a stable system. It&#8217;s chaotic because you can create systems that <em>don&#8217;t<\/em> break down, which are stable, but which are thoroughly unpredictable, and will never repeat a configuration.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the things that confused my when I started reading about chaos is easy to explain using what we&#8217;ve covered about attractors. (The image to the side was created by Jean-Francois Colonna, and is part of his slide-show here) Here&#8217;s the problem: We know that things like N-body gravitational systems are chaotic &#8211; and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[77],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-787","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chaos"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4lzZS-cH","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=787"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3677,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787\/revisions\/3677"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=787"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=787"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.goodmath.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}